| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause unauthenticated remote
code execution when the server is accessed via the network with knowledge of hidden URLs and manipulation
of host request header. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the embedded web server in various Lexmark devices. This vulnerability can be leveraged by an attacker to force the device to send an arbitrary HTTP request to a third-party server. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to internal network access / potential data disclosure from a device. |
| Use of password hash with insufficient computational effort issue exists in BUFFALO Wi-Fi router 'WSR-1800AX4 series'. When WPS is enabled, PIN code and/or Wi-Fi password may be obtained by an attacker. |
| hopetree izone lts c011b48 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the active push function as \\apps\\tool\\apis\\bd_push.py does not securely filter user input through push_urls() and get_urls(). |
| A restriction bypass vulnerability in is-localhost-ip could allow attackers to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
This issue affects is-localhost-ip: 2.0.0. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the URL processing functionality of PHProxy version 1.1.1 and prior. The input validation for the _proxurl parameter can be bypassed, allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to submit a specially crafted URL |
| ITPison OMICARD EDM fails to properly filter specific URL parameter, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to modify the parameters and conduct Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. This vulnerability enables attackers to probe internal network information. |
| The password of a web user in "Sante PACS Server.exe" is zero-padded to 0x2000 bytes, SHA1-hashed, base64-encoded, and stored in the USER table in the SQLite database HTTP.db. However, the number of hash bytes encoded and stored is truncated if the hash contains a zero byte |
| TwoNav 2.1.13 contains an SSRF vulnerability via the url paramater to index.php?c=api&method=read_data&type=connectivity_test (which reaches /system/api.php). |
| I, Librarian before and including 5.11.1 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to improper input validation in classes/security/validation.php |
| Multiple Elber products suffer from an unauthenticated device configuration and client-side hidden functionality disclosure. |
| An issue in Senayan Library Management System (SLiMS) 9 Bulian v.9.6.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the scrap_image.php component and the imageURL parameter |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR camera models, including iZero, Targa 512, Targa 504, Targa Semplice, Targa 704 TKM, Targa 805, Targa 710 INOX, Targa 750, and Targa 704 ILB. The application fails to validate user-supplied input in JSON POST parameters such as ipnotify_address and url, which are used by internal mechanisms to perform image fetch and DNS lookups. This allows remote unauthenticated attackers to induce the system to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external systems, potentially bypassing firewall policies or conducting internal service enumeration. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-01-25 UTC. |
| DeepDiff is a project focused on Deep Difference and search of any Python data. Versions 5.0.0 through 8.6.0 are vulnerable to class pollution via the Delta class constructor, and when combined with a gadget available in DeltaDiff, it can lead to Denial of Service and Remote Code Execution (via insecure Pickle deserialization) exploitation. The gadget available in DeepDiff allows `deepdiff.serialization.SAFE_TO_IMPORT` to be modified to allow dangerous classes such as posix.system, and then perform insecure Pickle deserialization via the Delta class. This potentially allows any Python code to be executed, given that the input to Delta is user-controlled. Depending on the application where DeepDiff is used, this can also lead to other vulnerabilities. This is fixed in version 8.6.1. |
| Versions of the package spatie/browsershot from 0.0.0 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the setUrl() function due to a missing restriction on user input, enabling attackers to access localhost and list all of its directories. |
| SummaryUsers with webhook permissions can conduct SSRF via webhooks. If they have permission to view the webhook logs, the (partial) request response is also disclosed
DetailsWhen sending webhooks, the destination is not validated, causing SSRF.
ImpactBypass of firewalls to interact with internal services.
See https://owasp.org/Top10/A10_2021-Server-Side_Request_Forgery_%28SSRF%29/ for more potential impact.
Resources https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Server_Side_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html for more information on SSRF and its fix. |
| A vulnerability was found in Intera InHire up to 20250530. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument 29chcotoo9 leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| Invoice Ninja is vulnerable to authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) allowing for arbitrary file read and network resource requests as the application user.
This issue affects Invoice Ninja: from 5.8.56 through 5.11.23. |
| The Your Friendly Drag and Drop Page Builder — Make Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.10 via the make_builder_ajax_subscribe() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| A vulnerability was identified in wangsongyan wblog 0.0.1. This affects the function RestorePost of the file backup.go. Such manipulation of the argument fileName leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
