| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in login.php in Elvin 1.2.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via a logout action. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenCA PKI 0.9.2.5, and possibly earlier versions, allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as authorized users via a link or IMG tag to RAServer. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the RSS module in vtiger CRM 5.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of Admin users for requests that modify the news feed system via the rssurl parameter in a Save action to index.php. |
| The web interface on the central phone server for the Snom 320 SIP Phone allows remote attackers to make arbitrary phone calls via the "Call a number" field. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2007-3440. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in I-O DATA DEVICE HDL-F160, HDL-F250, HDL-F300, and HDL-F320 firmware before 1.02 allows remote attackers to (1) change a configuration or (2) delete files as an authenticated user via unknown vectors. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the FAQ Ask module 5.x and 6.x before 6.x-2.0, a module for Drupal, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that access unpublished content. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in account/settings/account/index.php in phpFoX 1.6.21 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the email address via the act[update] action. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management interface in multiple Yamaha RT series routers allows remote attackers to change password settings and probably other configuration settings as administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bingo!CMS 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of other users for requests that modify configuration or change content via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface on the central phone server for the Snom 320 SIP Phone allow remote attackers to perform actions as the phone user, as demonstrated by inserting an address-book entry containing an XSS sequence. |
| The AutoCatSet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the autocatset_ajax function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger automatic recategorization of posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Comment Info Detector plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the options.php file when handling form submissions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Disable Content Editor For Specific Template plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on template configuration updates. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add or delete template configurations via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The login_register plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page and insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the 'login_register_login_post' parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The WP Posts Re-order plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `cpt_plugin_options()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings including capability, autosort, and adminsort settings, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Redirect countdown plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `countdown_settings_content()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings including the countdown timeout, redirect URL, and custom text, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The SR WP Minify HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the sr_minify_html_theme() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Invelity Product Feeds plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion via path traversal in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6. This is due to missing validation and sanitization in the 'createManageFeedPage' function. This makes it possible for authenticated administrator-level attackers to delete arbitrary files on the server via specially crafted requests that include path traversal sequences, granted they can trick an admin into clicking a malicious link. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in joshuae1974 Flash Video Player allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Flash Video Player: from n/a through 5.0.4. |
| The Add Custom Fields to Media plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the field deletion functionality in the admin display template. The plugin properly validates a nonce for the 'add field' operation (line 24-36), but the 'delete field' operation (lines 38-49) processes the $_GET['delete'] parameter and calls update_option() without any nonce verification. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary custom media fields via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
