Export limit exceeded: 358858 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (1692 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-27524 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Weak encryption vulnerability in Hitachi JP1/IT Desktop Management 2 - Smart Device Manager on Windows.This issue affects JP1/IT Desktop Management 2 - Smart Device Manager: from 12-00 before 12-00-08, from 11-10 through 11-10-08, from 11-00 through 11-00-05, from 10-50 through 10-50-06. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27508 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Emissary is a P2P based data-driven workflow engine. The ChecksumCalculator class within allows for hashing and checksum generation, but it includes or defaults to algorithms that are no longer recommended for secure cryptographic use cases (e.g., SHA-1, CRC32, and SSDEEP). These algorithms, while possibly valid for certain non-security-critical tasks, can expose users to security risks if used in scenarios where strong cryptographic guarantees are required. This issue is fixed in 8.24.0. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3365 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Due to reliance on a trivial substitution cipher, sent in cleartext, and the reliance on a default password when the user does not set a password, the Remote Mouse Server by Emote Interactive can be abused by attackers to inject OS commands over theproduct's custom control protocol. A Metasploit module was written and tested against version 4.110, the current version when this CVE was reserved. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3200 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit the used, insecure TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 protocols to intercept and manipulate encrypted communications between the Com-Server and connected systems. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30206 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Dpanel is a Docker visualization panel system which provides complete Docker management functions. The Dpanel service contains a hardcoded JWT secret in its default configuration, allowing attackers to generate valid JWT tokens and compromise the host machine. This security flaw allows attackers to analyze the source code, discover the embedded secret, and craft legitimate JWT tokens. By forging these tokens, an attacker can successfully bypass authentication mechanisms, impersonate privileged users, and gain unauthorized administrative access. Consequently, this enables full control over the host machine, potentially leading to severe consequences such as sensitive data exposure, unauthorized command execution, privilege escalation, or further lateral movement within the network environment. This issue is patched in version 1.6.1. A workaround for this vulnerability involves replacing the hardcoded secret with a securely generated value and load it from secure configuration storage. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55655 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| sigstore-python is a Python tool for generating and verifying Sigstore signatures. Versions of sigstore-python newer than 2.0.0 but prior to 3.6.0 perform insufficient validation of the "integration time" present in "v2" and "v3" bundles during the verification flow: the "integration time" is verified *if* a source of signed time (such as an inclusion promise) is present, but is otherwise trusted if no source of signed time is present. This does not affect "v1" bundles, as the "v1" bundle format always requires an inclusion promise. Sigstore uses signed time to support verification of signatures made against short-lived signing keys. The impact and severity of this weakness is *low*, as Sigstore contains multiple other enforcing components that prevent an attacker who modifies the integration timestamp within a bundle from impersonating a valid signature. In particular, an attacker who modifies the integration timestamp can induce a Denial of Service, but in no different manner than already possible with bundle access (e.g. modifying the signature itself such that it fails to verify). Separately, an attacker could upload a *new* entry to the transparency service, and substitute their new entry's time. However, this would still be rejected at validation time, as the new entry's (valid) signed time would be outside the validity window of the original signing certificate and would nonetheless render the attacker auditable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-45764 | 2026-04-15 | 3.2 Low | ||
| jsrsasign v11.1.0 was discovered to contain weak encryption. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by a third party who believes that CVE IDs can be assigned for key lengths in specific applications that use a library, and should not be assigned to the default key lengths in a library. This dispute is subject to review under CNA rules 4.1.4, 4.1.14, and other rules; the dispute tagging is not meant to recommend an outcome for this CVE Record. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14763 | 1 Amazon | 1 Aws S3 Encryption Client Java | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing cryptographic key commitment in the Amazon S3 Encryption Client for Java may allow a user with write access to the S3 bucket to introduce a new EDK that decrypts to different plaintext when the encrypted data key is stored in an "instruction file" instead of S3's metadata record. To mitigate this issue, upgrade Amazon S3 Encryption Client for Java to version 4.0.0 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41927 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The server supports at least one cipher suite which is on the NCSC-NL list of cipher suites to be phased out, increasing the risk of cryptographic weaknesses. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41928 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The device is observed to accept deprecated TLS protocols, increasing the risk of cryptographic weaknesses. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47921 | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High | ||
| Smadar SPS – CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm | ||||
| CVE-2025-31362 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Use of hard-coded cryptographic key issue exists in BizRobo! all versions. Credentials inside robot files may be obtained if the encryption key is available. The vendor provides the workaround information and recommends to apply it to the deployment environment. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3838 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An Improper Authorization vulnerability was identified in the EOL OVA based connect component which is deployed for installation purposes in the customer internal network. Under certain conditions, this could allow a bad actor to gain unauthorized access to the local db containing weakly hashed credentials of the installer. This EOL component was deprecated in September 2023 with end of support extended till January 2024. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5342 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 4.1 Medium |
| The Fedora Secure Boot CA certificate shipped with shim in Fedora was expired which could lead to old or invalid signed boot components being loaded. | ||||
| CVE-2023-7003 | 1 Sciener | 1 Ttlock App | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| The AES key utilized in the pairing process between a lock using Sciener firmware and a wireless keypad is not unique, and can be reused to compromise other locks using the Sciener firmware. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9317 | 1 Aveva | 1 Edge | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| The vulnerability, if exploited, could allow a miscreant with read access to Edge Project files or Edge Offline Cache files to reverse engineer Edge users' app-native or Active Directory passwords through computational brute-forcing of weak hashes. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7214 | 1 Fnkvision | 1 Fnk-gu2 | 2026-04-15 | 1.6 Low |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in FNKvision FNK-GU2 up to 40.1.7. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /etc/shadow of the component MD5. The manipulation leads to risky cryptographic algorithm. It is possible to launch the attack on the physical device. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66454 | 1 Arcadeai | 1 Arcade-mcp | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Arcade MCP allows you to to create, deploy, and share MCP Servers. Prior to 1.5.4, the arcade-mcp HTTP server uses a hardcoded default worker secret ("dev") that is never validated or overridden during normal server startup. As a result, any unauthenticated attacker who knows this default key can forge valid JWTs and fully bypass the FastAPI authentication layer. This grants remote access to all worker endpoints—including tool enumeration and tool invocation—without credentials. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61739 | 1 Johnsoncontrols | 5 Iq Panels2, Iq Panels2+, Iqhub and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Due to Nonce reuse, attackers can perform reply attack or decrypt captured packets. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11022 | 2026-04-15 | 5.6 Medium | ||
| The authentication process to the web server uses a challenge response procedure which inludes the nonce and additional information. This challenge can be used several times for login and is therefore vulnerable for a replay attack. | ||||