| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in default.asp in ASPCode CMS 1.5.8, 2.0.0 Build 103, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of an administrator for requests that (1) delete users via the delete action in the ma2 parameter or (2) create administrators via the update action in the ma2 parameter. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Limny 2.0 allow remote attackers to (1) hijack the authentication of users or administrators for requests that change the email address or password via the user action to index.php, and (2) hijack the authentication of the administrator for requests that create a new user via the admin/modules/user/new action to limny/index.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web interface in CUPS before 1.4.4, as used on Apple Mac OS X 10.5.8, Mac OS X 10.6 before 10.6.4, and other platforms, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change settings. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Performance Management before 6.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| The Schneider Electric Magelis XBT HMI controller has a default password for authentication of configuration uploads, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted configuration data. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration screen in wp-relatedposts.php in the WP Related Posts plugin 1.0 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) wp_relatedposts_title, (2) wp_relatedposts_num, or (3) wp_relatedposts_type parameter. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Web Console in IBM Data Studio 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that access monitored database information. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration page in the Recaptcha (aka WP-reCAPTCHA) plugin 2.9.8.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that disable the CAPTCHA requirement or insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) recaptcha_opt_pubkey, (2) recaptcha_opt_privkey, (3) re_tabindex, (4) error_blank, (5) error_incorrect, (6) mailhide_pub, (7) mailhide_priv, (8) mh_replace_link, or (9) mh_replace_title parameter. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the LocalFiles Editor plugin in Piwigo before 2.4.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create arbitrary PHP files via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in unspecified administrative modules in Proofpoint Messaging Security Gateway 6.2.0.263:6.2.0.237 and earlier in Proofpoint Protection Server 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5, 6.0.2, 6.1.1, and 6.2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cherokee-admin in Cherokee before 1.2.99 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences, as demonstrated by a crafted nickname field to vserver/apply. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the RESTful Web Services (restws) module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.2 and 7.x-2.x before 7.x-2.0-alpha4 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in user/profile/index.php in Moodle through 2.2.11, 2.3.x before 2.3.11, 2.4.x before 2.4.8, 2.5.x before 2.5.4, and 2.6.x before 2.6.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete (1) categories or (2) fields. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the administrative interface in Bloxx Web Filtering before 5.0.14 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that perform administrative actions. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Mahara before 1.0.15, 1.1.x before 1.1.9, and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in user/messageselect.php in the messaging system in Moodle 2.2.x before 2.2.7, 2.3.x before 2.3.4, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that send course messages. |
| Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in photo/pass.php in DAlbum 1.44 build 174 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a user via an add action, (2) change user passwords via a change action, or (3) delete a user via a delete action. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework on Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance (WSA) devices, Email Security Appliance (ESA) devices, and Content Security Management Appliance (SMA) devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug IDs CSCuh70263, CSCuh70323, and CSCuh26634. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WebAdmin application 6.0.5, 6.0.8, and 7.0 before P2 in IBM Netezza allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |