Export limit exceeded: 403615 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (403615 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-96207 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Partner Center | 2026-10-08 | 10 Critical |
| Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94510 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Bookings | 2026-10-08 | 9.9 Critical |
| Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88131 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Dataverse | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Dataverse allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83947 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Event Grid System | 2026-10-08 | 7.7 High |
| Missing authorization in Azure Event Grid allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77900 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure App Service | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| Missing authentication for critical function in Azure App Service allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69435 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Sre Agent | 2026-10-08 | 9.6 Critical |
| Missing authorization in Azure SRE Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96940 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Exchange Server 2016, Exchange Server 2019, Exchange Server Se and 4 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft Exchange Outlook Web Access (OWA) fails to properly handle web requests. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could perform script/content injection attacks and attempt to trick the user into disclosing sensitive information. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could send a specially crafted email message containing a malicious link to a user. Alternatively, an attacker could use a chat client to social engineer a user into clicking the malicious link. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Exchange validates web requests. Note: In order to exploit this vulnerability, a user must click a maliciously crafted link from an attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26466 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Openbsd and 1 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Openssh and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchange has finished. A malicious client may keep sending such packages, leading to an uncontrolled increase in memory consumption on the server side. Consequently, the server may become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86404 | 1 Redhat | 7 Amq Broker, Build Of Apache Camel For Quarkus, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot and 4 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| EAP's Artemis deserialization configuration permits deserialization by default. ObjectMessage.getObject() uses ObjectInputStreamWithClassLoader, which implements allow-list/block-list filtering via its checkSecurity()/isTrustedType() method. However, by default both allow-list and block-list are empty. When the allow-list is empty (size == 0), isTrustedType() returns true for ALL classes. This means all classes are deserializable by default. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89091 | 1 Redhat | 14 Acm, Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Core and 11 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in ansible-core. When installing a collection with `ansible-galaxy collection install`, the archive extractor validates member paths using lexical path normalisation (os.path.abspath) instead of resolving symbolic links (os.path.realpath), and it performs no containment check on symlink-typed directory members before creating them. A crafted collection tarball can chain symlink directory entries so that a subsequent file member is written outside the intended destination directory. This allows an attacker who can get a victim to install a malicious collection to overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the user running ansible-galaxy, leading to code execution on the control node. This is a bypass of the fix for CVE-2020-10691. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107376 | 1 Webonyx | 1 Graphql-php | 2026-10-08 | 8.2 High |
| webonyx graphql-php is a PHP implementation of the GraphQL specification. Prior to 15.32.3, GraphQL\Language\Parser performs recursive descent without a recursion limit in parseSelectionSet, parseValueLiteral, and parseTypeReference. A remote attacker can submit deeply nested selection sets, object or list values, or list types that exhaust the PHP process stack during pre-validation parsing, before query validation and complexity controls run. The resulting SIGSEGV can terminate PHP-FPM workers or long-running Swoole, RoadRunner, ReactPHP, or CLI processes and cannot be caught by application-level exception handling. This issue is fixed in version 15.32.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75875 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to path traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80381 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82895 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82900 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81932 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.6 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84032 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 5.6 Medium |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84035 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84057 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84058 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overrun in the TDS (Microsoft SQL Server) PRELOGIN packet decoder. A remote attacker who can send a specially crafted TDS PRELOGIN packet to a network monitored by an IBM Guardium Collector may cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code on the Collector appliance. | ||||