| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform VP9500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F1500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5500, 5100H, 5500H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5200, 5600, 5200H, 5600H, Hitachi Unified Storage VM, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G100, G200, G400, G600, G800, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F400, F600, F800, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H allows
local users to gain sensitive information.This issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform: before DKCMAIN Ver. 70-06-74-00/00, SVP Ver. 70-06-58/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform VP9500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 70-06-74-00/00, SVP Ver. 70-06-58/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-92-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-87/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F1500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-92-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-87/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5500,5100H, 5500H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-81-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-81/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-62-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-62/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-43-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-43/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5200, 5600,5200H, 5600H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-81-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-81/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-62-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-62/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-43-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-43/00; Hitachi Unified Storage VM: before DKCMAIN Ver. 73-03-75-X0/00, SVP Ver. 73-03-74/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 73(75)-03-75-X0/00, SVP Ver. 73(75)-03-74/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G100, G200, G400, G600, G800: before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-06-19-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-06-20-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-05-47-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-05-51-X0/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F400, F600, F800: before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-06-19-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-06-20-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-05-47-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-05-51-X0/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900: before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-09-XX/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-11-X0/02; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F350, F370, F700, F900: before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-09-XX/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-11-X0/02; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-81-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-81-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-62-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-62-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-43-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-43-X0/00.
|
| Deserialization of untrusted data can occur in the R statistical programming language, on any version starting at 1.4.0 up to and not including 4.4.0, enabling a maliciously crafted RDS (R Data Serialization) formatted file or R package to run arbitrary code on an end user’s system when interacted with. |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Topal Solutions AG Topal Finanzbuchhaltung on Windows allows Remote Code Execution.This issue affects at least Topal Finanzbuchhaltung: 10.1.5.20 and is fixed in version 11.2.12.00 |
| PixelYourSite - Your smart PIXEL (TAG) and API Manager 10.1.1.1 was found to be vulnerable. Unvalidated user input is used directly in an unserialize function in myapp/modules/facebook/facebook-server-a sync-task.php. |
| A flaw was found in Infinispan, when using JGroups with JDBC_PING. This issue occurs when an application inadvertently exposes sensitive information, such as configuration details or credentials, through logging mechanisms. This exposure can lead to unauthorized access and exploitation by malicious actors. |
| In affected versions of the Octopus Kubernetes worker or agent, sensitive variables could be written to the Kubernetes script pod log in clear-text. This was identified in Version 2 however it was determined that this could also be achieved in Version 1 and the fix was applied to both versions accordingly. |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in XU-YIJIE grpo-flat up to 9024b43f091e2eb9bac65802b120c0b35f9ba856. Affected is the function main of the file grpo_vanilla.py. The manipulation leads to deserialization. Local access is required to approach this attack. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. |
| Missing password field masking in the Zoom Jenkins Marketplace plugin before version 1.6 may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct a disclosure of information via adjacent network access. |
| SAP Web Dispatcher and Internet Communication Manager allow an attacker with administrative privileges to enable debugging trace mode with a specific parameter value. This exposes unencrypted passwords in the logs, causing a high impact on the confidentiality of the application. There is no impact on integrity or availability. |
| An information-disclosure vulnerability exists in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT application prior to version 7.7.0 that allows external access to the resources in certain admin root folders. |
| Link Following Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability in System Speedup Service in Avira Operations GmbH Avira Prime Version 1.1.96.2 on Windows 10 x64 allows local attackers to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM via creating a symbolic link and leveraging a TOCTTOU (time-of-check to time-of-use) attack. |
| A local privilege escalation vulnerability in Sophos Intercept X for Windows with Central Device Encryption 2024.2.0 and older allows writing of arbitrary files. |
| By using the "uscan" protocol provided by the eSCL specification, an attacker can discover the serial number of multi-function printers that implement the Brother-provided firmware. This serial number can, in turn, can be leveraged by the flaw described by CVE-2024-51978 to calculate the default administrator password. This flaw is similar to CVE-2024-51977, with the only difference being the protocol by which an attacker can use to learn the remote device's serial number. The eSCL/uscan vector is typically only exposed on the local network. Any discovery service that implements the eSCL specification can be used to exploit this vulnerability, and one such implementation is the runZero Explorer. Changing the default administrator password will render this vulnerability virtually worthless, since the calculated default administrator password would no longer be the correct password. |
| The The Next theme for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0 via deserialization of untrusted input from the wpeden_post_meta post meta value. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code. |
| The MultiPurpose theme for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0 via deserialization of untrusted input through the 'wpeden_post_meta' post meta. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code. |
| The H2O machine learning platform uses "Iced" classes as the primary means of moving Java Objects around the cluster. The Iced format supports inclusion of serialized Java objects. When a model is deserialized, any class is allowed to be deserialized (no class whitelist). An attacker can construct a crafted Iced model that uses Java gadgets and leads to arbitrary code execution when imported to the H2O platform. |
| A vulnerability classified as critical was found in lm-sys fastchat up to 0.2.36. This vulnerability affects the function split_files/apply_delta_low_cpu_mem of the file fastchat/model/apply_delta.py. The manipulation leads to deserialization. An attack has to be approached locally. |
| Dpanel is a Docker visualization panel system which provides complete Docker management functions. The Dpanel service contains a hardcoded JWT secret in its default configuration, allowing attackers to generate valid JWT tokens and compromise the host machine. This security flaw allows attackers to analyze the source code, discover the embedded secret, and craft legitimate JWT tokens. By forging these tokens, an attacker can successfully bypass authentication mechanisms, impersonate privileged users, and gain unauthorized administrative access. Consequently, this enables full control over the host machine, potentially leading to severe consequences such as sensitive data exposure, unauthorized command execution, privilege escalation, or further lateral movement within the network environment. This issue is patched in version 1.6.1. A workaround for this vulnerability involves replacing the hardcoded secret with a securely generated value and load it from secure configuration storage. |
| The CozyStay and TinySalt plugins for WordPress are vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.0, and in all versions up to, and including 3.9.0, respectively, via deserialization of untrusted input in the 'ajax_handler' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software, which means this vulnerability has no impact unless another plugin or theme containing a POP chain is installed on the site. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it may allow the attacker to perform actions like delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code depending on the POP chain present. |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.2, 9.2.4, and 9.1.7, and versions below 3.4.261 and 3.7.13 of the Splunk Secure Gateway app on Splunk Cloud Platform, a low-privileged user that does not hold the “admin“ or “power“ Splunk roles could perform a Remote Code Execution (RCE). |
