In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
writeback: report a Tasks-RCU quiescent state per cgwb drain pass
cleanup_offline_cgwbs_workfn() drains a dying cgwb by calling
cleanup_offline_cgwb() until it returns false, with a cond_resched()
between passes. On a CONFIG_PREEMPTION kernel that cond_resched() does
nothing: _cond_resched() is a plain "return 0", and under PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
the full and lazy modes disable it. Since commit 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched:
Further restrict the preemption modes") those are the only two models on
the architectures with PREEMPT_LAZY support, arm64 and x86 among them, so
the drain loop never reports a Tasks-RCU quiescent state.
A worker draining a cgwb with millions of attached inodes runs for
minutes. On a 6.18 arm64 host in lazy mode the cgwb worker drained one
dying cgroup's writeback domain for over 11 minutes. A BPF program unlink
(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog -> bpf_trampoline_update ->
unregister_ftrace_direct -> ftrace_shutdown -> synchronize_rcu_tasks())
waited on that grace period while holding the trampoline mutex, 42 tasks
queued behind it in D state, and the hung task detector fired at 614 s and
panicked the host. Any BPF or ftrace detach during a long drain inherits
the drain's length.
Fix this by calling cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() so we do not stall out
anybody who calls sycnrhonize_rcu_tasks(). We put this in a do { } while
loop because if we have many small cgroups cleanup_offline_cgwb() will
return false and we will never call cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), creating
the same problem.
writeback: report a Tasks-RCU quiescent state per cgwb drain pass
cleanup_offline_cgwbs_workfn() drains a dying cgwb by calling
cleanup_offline_cgwb() until it returns false, with a cond_resched()
between passes. On a CONFIG_PREEMPTION kernel that cond_resched() does
nothing: _cond_resched() is a plain "return 0", and under PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
the full and lazy modes disable it. Since commit 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched:
Further restrict the preemption modes") those are the only two models on
the architectures with PREEMPT_LAZY support, arm64 and x86 among them, so
the drain loop never reports a Tasks-RCU quiescent state.
A worker draining a cgwb with millions of attached inodes runs for
minutes. On a 6.18 arm64 host in lazy mode the cgwb worker drained one
dying cgroup's writeback domain for over 11 minutes. A BPF program unlink
(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog -> bpf_trampoline_update ->
unregister_ftrace_direct -> ftrace_shutdown -> synchronize_rcu_tasks())
waited on that grace period while holding the trampoline mutex, 42 tasks
queued behind it in D state, and the hung task detector fired at 614 s and
panicked the host. Any BPF or ftrace detach during a long drain inherits
the drain's length.
Fix this by calling cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() so we do not stall out
anybody who calls sycnrhonize_rcu_tasks(). We put this in a do { } while
loop because if we have many small cgroups cleanup_offline_cgwb() will
return false and we will never call cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), creating
the same problem.
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | unaffected |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Linux | Linux | affected |
|
No data.
No data.
No data.
Advisories
No advisories yet.
Fixes
Solution
No solution given by the vendor.
Workaround
No workaround given by the vendor.
References
History
Sun, 18 Oct 2026 15:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: writeback: report a Tasks-RCU quiescent state per cgwb drain pass cleanup_offline_cgwbs_workfn() drains a dying cgwb by calling cleanup_offline_cgwb() until it returns false, with a cond_resched() between passes. On a CONFIG_PREEMPTION kernel that cond_resched() does nothing: _cond_resched() is a plain "return 0", and under PREEMPT_DYNAMIC the full and lazy modes disable it. Since commit 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes") those are the only two models on the architectures with PREEMPT_LAZY support, arm64 and x86 among them, so the drain loop never reports a Tasks-RCU quiescent state. A worker draining a cgwb with millions of attached inodes runs for minutes. On a 6.18 arm64 host in lazy mode the cgwb worker drained one dying cgroup's writeback domain for over 11 minutes. A BPF program unlink (bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog -> bpf_trampoline_update -> unregister_ftrace_direct -> ftrace_shutdown -> synchronize_rcu_tasks()) waited on that grace period while holding the trampoline mutex, 42 tasks queued behind it in D state, and the hung task detector fired at 614 s and panicked the host. Any BPF or ftrace detach during a long drain inherits the drain's length. Fix this by calling cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() so we do not stall out anybody who calls sycnrhonize_rcu_tasks(). We put this in a do { } while loop because if we have many small cgroups cleanup_offline_cgwb() will return false and we will never call cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), creating the same problem. | |
| Title | writeback: report a Tasks-RCU quiescent state per cgwb drain pass | |
| First Time appeared |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | |
| Vendors & Products |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| References |
|
|
Projects
Sign in to view the affected projects.
MITRE
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: Linux
Published:
Updated: 2026-10-18T15:18:04.013Z
Reserved: 2026-09-25T10:25:14.355Z
Link: CVE-2026-98536
Vulnrichment
No data.
NVD
Status : Received
Published: 2026-10-18T16:17:05.357
Modified: 2026-10-18T16:17:05.357
Link: CVE-2026-98536
Redhat
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
No data.
Weaknesses
No weakness.