Export limit exceeded: 398824 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (398824 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-101048 | 1 Cloudreve | 1 Cloudreve | 2026-09-27 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cloudreve before 4.17.0 registers the administrative node test endpoints (POST /api/v4/admin/node/test and POST /api/v4/admin/node/test/downloader) without requiring the Admin.Write OAuth scope, unlike the node create/update/delete routes. An OAuth client that has been authorized by an administrator with only the Admin.Read scope can therefore submit attacker-controlled node definitions and cause the Cloudreve server to issue outbound requests to arbitrary URLs, enabling blind server-side request forgery, internal service probing, and delivery of signed Cloudreve slave-style requests to attacker-chosen endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101047 | 1 Fleetdm | 1 Fleet | 2026-09-27 | 5.3 Medium |
| Fleet before 4.87.0 does not protect the two endpoints that serve in-house iOS application packages and manifests (enterprise tier only) with the intended random, time-limited URL token. Because Apple's InstallEnterpriseApplication MDM command requires these URLs to be reachable without a Fleet session, they cannot rely on session-based authentication, and the missing token allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the Fleet server to download in-house IPA binaries and their metadata (bundle identifier, version, and name) by guessing sequential title identifiers. The impact is limited to read-only disclosure; there is no privilege escalation or write access, and the free tier is unaffected (it returns fleet.ErrMissingLicense). | ||||
| CVE-2026-100852 | 1 Azuracast | 1 Azuracast | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| AzuraCast before 0.23.8 contains a command injection vulnerability in the Liquidsoap config generation for live recording that fails to quote the streamer username in process.run calls. Authenticated station users with Streamers and Profile permissions can set a username containing shell metacharacters and trigger command execution as the Liquidsoap process user when recording closes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100673 | 1 Getgrav | 1 Grav | 2026-09-27 | 8.2 High |
| The Grav Data Manager plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-datamanager) versions 1.0.1 through 1.4.4 render stored data entries in the item-detail view (admin/templates/partials/item.html.twig) without escaping, applying Twig's `raw` filter — in some cases after a striptags('<br>') call that PHP's strip_tags() bypasses by preserving allowed tags together with their attributes. An unauthenticated visitor who submits a front-end form whose submissions are saved to user/data can store an HTML payload that executes as JavaScript in the session and origin of an administrator who later opens that entry in the classic admin panel, running with that administrator's privileges and CSRF token. Execution occurs without further interaction for list values (such as checkbox or multi-select fields) and on hover for ordinary text fields. Sites using the Grav 2.0 Admin Next interface are not affected, because it renders the same data through a separate, correctly escaping code path. The issue is fixed in Data Manager 1.4.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100672 | 1 Getgrav | 1 Grav | 2026-09-27 | 7.5 High |
| The Comments plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-comments) for Grav CMS through version 1.2.10 registers an admin handler that returns comment data as JSON without any authentication check. The handler branches on isAdmin(), which only indicates that the admin service is registered on the current route rather than that the visitor is authenticated, and it echoes the JSON and calls exit() during the plugins stage, before the classic Admin plugin would render its login screen. On a site using the classic Admin plugin with Comments enabled (the default), an unauthenticated remote attacker can request /admin/comments/page:<n> (e.g. page:0.001) and retrieve every comment from the last 7 days, including each commenter's email address and the absolute server filesystem path of the data file. Sites running the Grav 2.0 Admin Next stack (admin2 + api) are not affected via this path. The issue is fixed in 1.2.11, which requires an authenticated user with admin.comments or admin.super and removes the absolute filePath from the response. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100666 | 1 Netty | 1 Netty | 2026-09-27 | 7.3 High |
| Netty's HttpServerCodec (io.netty:netty-codec-http) in versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.16.Final and in versions up to and including 4.1.136.Final pairs each outbound response with an inbound request by calling pollMethod() once per response, including for 1xx informational responses. If a client pipelines an HTTP/1.1 GET carrying an Expect: 100-continue header followed by a HEAD request, the 100 Continue response consumes the queued GET method, so the subsequent 200 OK for the GET is paired with HEAD and its body is dropped, while the following 200 OK for the HEAD request is written with a body. This desynchronizes HTTP parsing on the connection: the GET entity is never delivered and the HEAD response body is interpreted as the GET body, resulting in response splitting and unsafe connection reuse. Fixed in 4.2.17.Final and 4.1.137.Final. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100664 | 1 Netty | 1 Netty | 2026-09-27 | 7.5 High |
| Netty's HTTP/3 codec (io.netty:netty-codec-http3) versions 4.2.2.Final through 4.2.17.Final builds the HTTP/3 :authority pseudo-header from the HTTP/1 Host header before considering the authority of an absolute-form HTTP/1 request-target. In HttpConversionUtil.toHttp3Headers(HttpMessage, boolean) — reached via Http3FrameToHttpObjectCodec(false) — a non-empty Host header takes precedence over the request-target authority, contrary to the HTTP/1.1 rule that a server receiving an absolute-form request-target must ignore the Host header. In a Netty-based HTTP/1-to-HTTP/3 gateway, proxy, or protocol bridge, a remote client can send a request such as "GET https://trusted.example/admin HTTP/1.1" with "Host: attacker.example", causing components that validate, authorize, or route on the RFC-defined request-target authority to reach a different decision than the upstream HTTP/3 peer, which receives :authority derived from the conflicting Host header. This authority confusion can affect virtual-host routing, allow-list checks, backend selection, cache keys, and URL generation. The advisory reports integrity impact only (no code execution, memory corruption, or availability impact). Fixed in 4.2.18.Final. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100659 | 1 Netty | 1 Netty | 2026-09-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| Netty's HTTP/3 codec (io.netty:netty-codec-http3) in versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.17.Final does not enforce the RFC 9114 requirement that the :authority pseudo-header field and a literal host header field, when both present, carry the same value. A remote unauthenticated peer can send a single HEADERS frame containing both fields with differing, attacker-controlled values; the request is accepted and delivered to the application with two conflicting authorities, allowing routing, virtual-host, and access-control decisions to be bypassed when different components in the request path consult different fields. This issue is fixed in 4.2.18.Final. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67633 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (cu 31), Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (cu 32) and 9 more | 2026-09-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69686 | 1 Microsoft | 18 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft 365 Apps For Enterprise and 15 more | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101041 | 2026-09-27 | N/A | ||
| The account recovery (password reset) functionality in the vulnerability-lookup web application contains a time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the consumption of single-use recovery tokens. The original implementation verified the token nonce against the stored digest and then consumed (cleared) it in separate database operations. Two concurrent HTTP requests presenting the same valid recovery token could both pass the verification check before either transaction committed, allowing both to set their own password on the target account. The last transaction to commit overwrites the first, enabling an attacker who possesses a valid recovery token to replace the legitimate user's password with one of their choosing. A secondary defect in the same endpoint (confirm_account) allowed a valid recovery link to be used to set an empty or trivially short password (e.g., three characters). The view handler performed only a manual equality comparison between the two password fields and never invoked the form's validation logic, bypassing the intended minimum-length and complexity constraints. The affected component is the user account recovery endpoint (/user/confirm_account/<token>) and the associated token verification and consumption logic in the User model (website/models/user.py) and the view layer (website/web/views/user.py). | ||||
| CVE-2026-69355 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Exchange Server 2016, Exchange Server 2019, Exchange Server Se and 1 more | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| External control of file name or path in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80078 | 1 Microsoft | 15 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft 365 Apps For Enterprise and 12 more | 2026-09-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100871 | 1 Sylius | 1 Sylius | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| Sylius versions before 1.12.25, 1.13.17, 1.14.20, 2.1.16, and 2.2.9 fail to include firewall identification in JWT tokens issued by separate Admin and Shop API endpoints. Attackers can register a shop customer account using an administrator's email address and obtain a token that the Admin API resolves to that administrator, granting full administrative access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100870 | 1 Sylius | 1 Sylius | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| Sylius versions before 1.12.25, 1.13.17, 1.14.20, 2.1.16, and 2.2.9 build administrator password-reset links using the request Host header without validation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to redirect reset tokens to attacker-controlled domains. Attackers can request password resets for known administrator email addresses with forged Host headers to intercept valid reset tokens and take over administrator accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15442 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-09-27 | N/A |
| In all builds that make use of (D)TLS, including default builds, there is a series of conditional states during the TLS shutdown which could lead to a heap-use-after free. If an application ended up getting a partial wolfSSL_read() which is sometimes caused by a small user buffer passed in, then called wolfSSL_shutdown for a bidirectional close and attempted to wolfSSL_read() again while the peer continues trying to send data during the shutdown it would lead to a state where a potential heap-use-after free happened. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63564 | 1 Moodle | 1 Socialwall Plugin | 2026-09-27 | 9.8 Critical |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Moodle Socialwall plugin v.3.0 through v.3.3 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via crafted HTTP requests | ||||
| CVE-2026-79310 | 1 Webpy | 1 Webpy | 2026-09-27 | 8.5 High |
| webpy web.py 0.76 is vulnerable to server-side template injection (SSTI). The template engine can be tricked into executing attacker-controlled template code that built-in security checks are designed to reject. When an application precompiles templates from a directory the attacker can write to and later renders them through the precompiled template loader, the sandbox is bypassed and the attacker's code runs, resulting in arbitrary Python code execution and OS command execution on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86785 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Social Commerce For Woocommerce | 2026-09-27 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Social Commerce for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 2.5.4 does not have authorisation checks on some of its REST API endpoints, allowing unauthenticated users to update Social Commerce for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 2.5.4 configuration and product synchronisation state. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4997 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Jet Form Builder Stripe Gateway | 2026-09-27 | 8.6 High |
| The jet-form-builder-stripe-gateway WordPress plugin before 1.1.0 does not sanitise and escape a payment token before using it in a SQL statement, allowing unauthenticated users to extract arbitrary data from the database, including password hashes. | ||||