Export limit exceeded: 11078 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11078 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-14362 | 1 Microfocus | 1 Project And Portfolio Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management Center, version 9.32. This vulnerability could be exploited to allow a Cross-Site Forgery attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1442 | 1 Ibm | 1 Emptoris Services Procurement | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Emptoris Services Procurement 10.0.0.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 128107. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9062 | 2 Debian, Wordpress | 2 Debian Linux, Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In WordPress before 4.7.5, there is improper handling of post meta data values in the XML-RPC API. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14530 | 1 Crony Cronjob Manager Project | 1 Crony Cronjob Manager | 2025-04-20 | 8.0 High |
| WP_Admin_UI in the Crony Cronjob Manager plugin before 0.4.7 for WordPress has CSRF via the name parameter in an action=manage&do=create operation, as demonstrated by inserting XSS sequences. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2688 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Rox I | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The integrated web server in Siemens RUGGEDCOM ROX I (all versions) at port 10000/TCP could allow remote attackers to perform actions with the privileges of an authenticated user, provided the targeted user has an active session and is induced into clicking on a malicious link or into visiting a malicious website, aka CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15734 | 1 Phpmyfaq | 1 Phpmyfaq | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admin/stat.main.php. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15733 | 1 Phpmyfaq | 1 Phpmyfaq | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admin/ajax.attachment.php and admin/att.main.php. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5891 | 1 Asus | 2 Rt-ac1750, Rt-ac1750 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| ASUS RT-AC* and RT-N* devices with firmware before 3.0.0.4.380.7378 have Login Page CSRF and Save Settings CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9930 | 1 Greenpacket | 2 Dx-350, Dx-350 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists in Green Packet DX-350 Firmware version v2.8.9.5-g1.4.8-atheeb, as demonstrated by a request to ajax.cgi that enables UPnP. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5258 | 2 Fedoraproject, Vmware | 2 Fedora, Spring Social | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in springframework-social before 1.1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5473 | 1 Ntop | 1 Ntopng | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ntopng through 2.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, as demonstrated by admin/add_user.lua, admin/change_user_prefs.lua, admin/delete_user.lua, and admin/password_reset.lua. | ||||
| CVE-2012-4568 | 1 Letodms Project | 1 Letodms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in LetoDMS (formerly MyDMS) before 3.3.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2014-4843 | 1 Ibm | 1 Curam Social Program Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Curam Universal Access in IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.6, and 6.0.5 before 6.0.5.5 iFix5 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about internal caseworker usernames via vectors related to a URL. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7715 | 1 Realtyna | 1 Realtyna Property Listing | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Realtyna RPL (com_rpl) component before 8.9.5 for Joomla! allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add a user via an add_user action to administrator/index.php. | ||||
| CVE-2017-13129 | 1 Zkteco | 1 Zktime Web | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ZKTeco ZKTime Web 2.0.1.12280 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add administrators by leveraging lack of anti-CSRF tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2014-9565 | 1 Ibm | 4 En6131, En6131 Firmware, Ib6131 and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Flex System EN6131 40Gb Ethernet and IB6131 40Gb Infiniband Switch firmware 3.4.0000 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4884 | 1 Basercms | 1 Basercms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Blog version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6497 | 1 Apache | 1 Groovy Ldap | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| main/java/org/apache/directory/groovyldap/LDAP.java in the Groovy LDAP API in Apache allows attackers to conduct LDAP entry poisoning attacks by leveraging setting returnObjFlag to true for all search methods. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2539 | 1 Atutor | 1 Atutor | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in install_modules.php in ATutor before 2.2.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that upload arbitrary files and execute arbitrary PHP code via vectors involving a crafted zip file. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3191 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the change_email form in UAA is vulnerable to a CSRF attack. This allows an attacker to trigger an e-mail change for a user logged into a cloud foundry instance via a malicious link on a attacker controlled site. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | ||||