Export limit exceeded: 416079 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (416079 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-86383 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-28 | 6.8 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86380 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-28 | 7.2 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86379 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain Management Center | 2026-10-28 | 7.2 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Management Center, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86378 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87097 | 1 Acronis | 1 Acronis Cyber Protect 17 | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Sensitive information disclosure due to insufficiently protected credentials. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, Windows) before build 42587. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87101 | 1 Acronis | 1 Acronis Cyber Protect 17 | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Sensitive information disclosure due to improper token validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, Windows) before build 42587. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86377 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-28 | 7.6 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87103 | 1 Acronis | 1 Acronis Cyber Protect 17 | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to improper token validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, Windows) before build 42587. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87098 | 1 Acronis | 1 Acronis Cyber Protect 17 | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Sensitive information disclosure due to improper authorization. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, Windows) before build 42587. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87099 | 1 Acronis | 1 Acronis Cyber Protect 17 | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability due to improper input validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, Windows) before build 42587. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87102 | 1 Acronis | 1 Acronis Cyber Protect 17 | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to improper token validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, Windows) before build 42587. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102790 | 2026-10-28 | N/A | ||
| Joomla Extension - icagenda.com - Stored XSS via url-type event Custom Field in iCagenda 3.2.1 to 4.0.16 | ||||
| CVE-2026-81472 | 2026-10-28 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| Dell iDRAC Service Module (iSM) for Windows, Dell iDRAC Service Module (iSM) for Linux, and Dell iDRAC Service Module (iSM) for ESXi, versions prior to 6.1.1.0, contains an Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114278 | 2026-10-28 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The che-machine-exec service constructs a shell command by concatenating user-controlled input (the username and namespace fields from the /exec/init and /exec/config JSON endpoints) into a double-quoted sh -c "echo "..." > ..." invocation without any escaping. When che-machine-exec is run with authentication disabled (its default), any network-reachable attacker can achieve remote code execution in containers che-machine-exec is configured to access, via shell command substitution ($(...) or backticks). | ||||
| CVE-2026-102799 | 2026-10-28 | N/A | ||
| Joomla Extension - icagenda.com - CSV formula injection in the registrations export in iCagenda 3.5.0 to 4.0.16 | ||||
| CVE-2026-99124 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/pci: Fix leak of uninitialized kernel data in SCLP report While report_error_write() checks that the provided buffer is at least as large as the header struct, but not that it is large enough to contain the report with the length claimed by report->length. If user-space provides a short buffer, meaning a larger report->length than the actually written payload, up to around 4K of kernel data from past the kmalloc(len + 1) sized buffer allocated in kernfs_fop_write_iter() will leak into the SCLP report. However, as the entity processing the SCLP is privileged and able to access at least the page including the report, this does not leak data that entity could not access but it is still an out of bounds read and a malformed error report that should be rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99128 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: validate chunk length in the inqueue parser SCTP chunks always include a four-byte generic header, but sctp_inq_pop() currently accepts shorter declared lengths. A zero-length chunk leaves chunk_end at the current header. When ASCONF is covered by the association's SCTP-AUTH policy, sctp_assoc_bh_rcv() can continue before the state machine performs its normal chunk-length check. sctp_inq_pop() then returns the same malformed chunk repeatedly and the receive softirq can lock up. A remote SCTP peer can trigger this after establishing an association on a kernel built with CONFIG_IP_SCTP and configured with net.sctp.addip_enable=1 and net.sctp.auth_enable=1. The reproducer did not require application credentials, a shared SCTP AUTH key, or net.sctp.addip_noauth_enable=1. On commit f967455fb2a5 ("seg6: reset IP6CB after IPv6 decapsulation"), one zero-length ASCONF caused repeated watchdog soft-lockup reports in a two-vCPU KVM guest. All 3 pre-trigger health probes succeeded, while 36 of 37 post-trigger probes failed. With this change, all 37 post-trigger probes succeeded and no equivalent soft-lockup signature appeared. Reject chunks shorter than the generic SCTP header at the shared inqueue parser boundary. Mark the packet for discard before either caller can continue processing it, while preserving the four-byte generic minimum. Declared-length 1 through 4 controls and kernel-generated ASCONF traffic remained healthy. The patched sctp_hello selftest passed for IPv4 and IPv6. The complete private reproducer and validation evidence are available directly to maintainers on request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99129 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux: fix BPF token permission checks Avoid multiple lookups of the bpffs creator SID using the token's file descriptor when the same information can be found via the resolved path/dentry (in selinux_bpf_token_create()) or the token itself (in selinux_bpf_map_create() and selinux_bpf_prog_load()). Not only does this simplify the code, it avoids potential TOCTOU issues if the user changes the token file descriptor passed into the kernel. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99130 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/cancel: don't spin on local work the task can't run io_uring_cancel_generic() refuses to sleep while any ring on the exiting task's tctx has local work pending. It assumes the task is that ring's submitter and that the next io_uring_try_cancel_requests() pass will run the work. This does not hold for a ring that was still IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED when the task got its tctx node from io_uring_create() or io_ringfd_register(). The submitter is set later by IORING_REGISTER_ENABLE_RINGS, possibly from another task, and only the submitter may run local work on an IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN ring. To the exiting task the work stays pending forever, the loop never reaches schedule(), and the task trips the WARN_ON_ONCE() once and then spins in do_exit(). An unprivileged user can set this up at will by creating a disabled ring, having a child enable it and stop, posting to the ring with IORING_OP_MSG_RING and exiting with a request in flight that only the child can complete. The exiting thread burns a CPU until the child runs or dies, and with panic_on_warn set the WARN panics the kernel. Fix by skipping the sleep only when io_allowed_defer_tw_run() allows the task to run the work. This is reasonable since work it cannot run cannot complete any of its requests either, so nothing is lost by sleeping. Drop the WARN_ON_ONCE() since handing a disabled ring to another thread is a supported scenario, not a bug state. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99131 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: fix capability check in xfs An user reported a bug where he managed to evade group's quota by changing a file's gid to a different group id the same user belonged to, even though quotas were enforced on both gids and the file's size was big enough to exceed the quota's hardlimit. Commit eba0549bc7d1 replaced a capable() call by a has_capability_noaudit() to prevent unnecessary selinux audit messages. Turns out that both calls have slightly different semantics even though their documentation seems similar. Where in a nutshell: capable() - Tests the task's effective credentials has_ns_capability_noaudit() - Tests the task's real credentials This most of the time has no practical difference but in some cases like changing attrs (specifically group id in this case) through a NFS client this will allow the quota code to use XFS_QMOPT_FORCE_RES, effectively bypassing quota accounting checks. Using instead ns_capable_noaudit() should fix this issue and prevent selinux audit messages. This also fix the remaining calls to has_capability_noaudit() | ||||